Dear FIRM@FOSE Attendee:

 

Please help us by taking a few minutes to provide feedback on today’s program and presentations by responding to the following brief questionnaire.  Your opinions will enable us to identify and announce the top-ranked presentations by category, and also to improve the value of future forums. You will not be asked for any personally identifying information and the confidentiality of your answers will be maintained.

Thank you for your collaboration!

 

The FIRM Board of Directors

 

1.      How well did the Keynote Address by Karen Evans clearly define how OMB expects agencies to manage, share and use electronics records series, systems, and technologies?

Very Well                                                                                   Not At All

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                DK/NA

 

Part #1-- Evaluation of Individual Presentations

 

Please rate each presentation as it is completed, to capture your fresh impressions. Rate each one on each of the following three factors:

1) How completely and well did the presentation demonstrate attention to mapping to the Federal Enterprise Architecture Technical Reference Model (TRM) to facilitate interoperability through conformance with the applicable standards?

2) How well did it address records management performance metrics? 

3) How useful will the information provided be in helping make your organization’s future management and records sharing more efficient and effective?

 

Note: Circle your choice on each line.  Do not rate speaker if you did not attend the presentation.

Presenter

Rating Factor

Rating Scores

 

 

Fully

Mostly

Some

Little

Not at All

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Dr. Mark Giguere, NARA & Dr. Rick Klobuchar, SAIC

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Melvin Greer, LMSC

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Ron Kelly, DoD

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Matt Staden, Navy Dept.

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Selene Dalecky, GPO

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Josh Lubell, NIST

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

Elisa Liberatori-Prati, World Bank

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

 

Map to TRM Model

1

2

3

4

5

J.L. Needham, Google

RM Performance Metrics

1

2

3

4

5

 

Future Value

1

2

3

4

5

2.      How informative were FIRM Board Chairman Bennett’s “Concluding Remarks” in summing up the forum?

 

Highly Informative                                                 Little Useful Information

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                            DK/NA

 

PART #2  General Evaluation of FIRM@FOSE Forum

 

  1. The FIRM Forum Session (Please evaluate based on entire FIRM session) Circle the number corresponding rating in each question. Circle “DK/NA” if unable to rate for any reason.

 

  1. How relevant was the topic of this forum to your/your department’s or your organization’s work?

 

Highly Relevant                                                                         Not Relevant

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                            DK/NA

 

  1. How well did whole set of presentations address the forum’s general topic “Record Management Performance Metrics: Good Practices and Tools?”

 

Very Well                                                                                   Very Poorly

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                            DK/NA

 

  1. How well did the “Pecha Kucha” (brief and “to the point”) presentation format work?

 

Very Well                                                                                   Very Poorly

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                            DK/NA

 

  1. How did you first hear about the FIRM Forum? (Check one answer.)

                        FOSE website

                        Another website

                        Email from colleague

                        Posting to email listserv

                        Word of mouth

                  etc. etc. to be completed by others--JB

 

 

  1. How likely is the formation of productive business partnerships between federal agencies and vendors to meet Federal E-Gov, and IT and information-sharing requirements?

 

Very Likely                                                                                Not Likely                                                      

                  1                      2                     3                        4                      5                DK/NA

 

  1. Although your survey responses will remain confidential, information about your professional role or affiliation will be invaluable in our analysis. (Please check (ü) the best description below):

 

Fed/IT (  )   Fed/RM (  )   Non-Fed/IT (  )   Non-Fed/RM (  )   Other (Please specify) (  ) _______________________

 

Thank you again for your valuable opinions! We invite you to comment further in your own words; for example, how well did the Pecha Kucha format seem to work, what topics would you retain in or add to a future forum, what other major stakeholders such as OMB and NARA should be invited to speak, and the like.

 

Comments: